做一顆牙冠（假牙牙套）要多少錢？根管治療或大蛀牙之後被建議做牙套，先看懂報價單｜證據鏈

做一顆牙冠（假牙牙套）要多少錢？根管治療或大蛀牙之後被建議做牙套，先看懂報價單｜證據鏈

F-Units（事實單元帳）

每條標明來源、confidence、basis、期間、geo 與 caveat。basis 階梯：law ＞ official_statement ＞ clinical_guideline ＞ peer_reviewed ＞ textbook。

• F1｜confidence: high｜basis: internal_dataset（S23，非醫學宣稱）｜period: GSC 保留窗（2025-03-22 起）｜geo: TW｜本題選題依據＝14 診所站搜尋資料對帳，14 詞項、跨 4 站，逐筆可對帳｜caveat: 內部數據，發布時不進可見層。
• F2｜confidence: n/a｜basis: 結構性整理（編輯框架，S24，非事實宣稱）｜geo: universal｜本卡的「六塊拆項」框架、與固定假牙費用卡的分工邊界（本卡＝牙根還在的單顆牙冠；三分流與牙橋在 KM-DENTAL-03）、以及「兩種常見就診情境」的敘述結構，皆為本站編輯定義的說明結構，非外部事實。
• F3｜confidence: n/a｜basis: 證據缺口聲明（editorial，非待驗）｜geo: universal｜本次檢索未取得以下項目的可引用證據，故本卡不寫：①任何金額、區間或行情 ②牙冠可使用年限的個人預測 ③台灣本土的牙冠存活率統計 ④保固條款的內容與效力（屬契約約定，非醫學問題，本站不提供法律見解）。
• F4｜confidence: medium｜basis: peer_reviewed（回溯性世代研究，PMID 11941351）｜period: 1985–1996 治療資料，2002 刊出｜geo: universal｜span: 「When tooth type and radiographic evidence of caries at access were controlled, the final Cox model showed that endodontically treated teeth not crowned after obturation were lost at a 6.0 times greater rate than teeth crowned after obturation (95% confidence interval: 3.2 to 11.3).」「Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were generated for the 203 teeth that satisfied study inclusion criteria.」「Within the limitations of this study, a strong association between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth was observed.」｜caveat: 回溯性、單一大學院所、非隨機分派；顯示關聯不等於因果；資料年代久遠。
• F5｜confidence: high｜basis: peer_reviewed（Cochrane systematic review，PMID 26403154）｜period: 2015 更新版（pub3），檢索至 2015-03-26｜geo: universal｜span: 「We included one trial, which was judged to be at high risk of performance, detection and attrition bias.」「There was no clear difference between the crown and composite group and the composite only group for non-catastrophic failures of the restoration」「The quality of the evidence for these outcomes is very low.」「There is insufficient evidence to assess the effects of crowns compared to conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth.」｜caveat: 版本時效查核（2026-08-06）：PubMed 以原文標題檢索共 3 筆＝2012 初版（pub2）、2015 更新版（pub3）與 2016 年的評論文，未見更新版；本卡引用的即為現行版本，但其檢索窗停在 2015 年，須與 F6、F10 的較新回顧並讀。
• F6｜confidence: high｜basis: peer_reviewed（systematic review・meta-analysis，PMID 38949036）｜period: 檢索至 2023-01，2024 刊出｜geo: universal｜span: 「The pooled survival rates at 4-7 years and 8-20 years of root-filled posterior teeth regardless of tooth type was 91% (95% CI, 0.85; 0.95) and 87% (95% CI, 0.77; 0.93), respectively.」「The prognostic tooth-related factors mentioned in the included studies were (i) remaining coronal tooth structure, (ii) ferrule, (iii) crown-to-root ratio (iv) tooth type and location (v) periodontal disease (vi) proximal contacts and (vii) cracks.」「However, there is a paucity of evidence, and more research is needed in this area.」｜caveat: 20 篇進統合分析，多為回溯性研究；預後因素部分為敘述性整理，非統合估計；2026-08-06 檢索未見本題有更新的存活統合分析。
• F7｜confidence: medium｜basis: peer_reviewed（systematic review・meta-analysis，PMID 34530058）｜period: 檢索 2021-07-13，2021 刊出｜geo: universal｜span: 「The random effects model for subgroup meta-analysis revealed failures for posterior RFT increased with decreasing numbers of remaining walls.」「Failures for 0 remaining walls were 23% (95% CI = 10% - 36%) and for one remaining wall 15% (CI: 3% -26%), irrespective of follow-up times.」｜caveat: 族群限定＝以纖維柱心加單顆牙冠修復之根管治療後牙齒，僅 5 篇納入；不可外推到所有牙冠或未做柱心的情形；2026-08-06 檢索未見更新版。
• F8｜confidence: medium｜basis: peer_reviewed（systematic review・meta-analysis，PMID 41601347）｜period: 2026 刊出｜geo: universal｜span: 「To systematically review and meta-analyze clinical, in vitro, and finite-element studies assessing how ferrule height, width, and circumferential extent influence fracture resistance and survival of endodontically treated teeth.」「Thirty-three primary studies (6 clinical, 18 in vitro, 9 finite-element) were included.」「Ferrule height ≥ 2 mm significantly improved fracture resistance (MD +165 N; 95% CI: 110-215). Ferrule presence increased clinical survival (RR 1.34; 95% CI: 1.12-1.59). Dentin thickness ≥ 1 mm and complete 360° ferrules provided the most favorable reinforcement, while partial ferrules with ≥ 2 opposing walls remained beneficial.」「These findings should be interpreted within the context of variation in study designs and reporting quality.」｜caveat: 版本時效查核（2026-08-06）：本篇刊期較 F9（2024）新，2026-08-06 於 PubMed 以環箍＋SR/MA 檢索未見更晚於本篇的同題回顧；但其納入 33 篇中僅 6 篇為臨床研究，其餘為體外實驗與有限元素分析，臨床外推須保守，故本卡同時保留只納臨床研究的 F9。
• F9｜confidence: medium｜basis: peer_reviewed（systematic review・meta-analysis，臨床研究限定，PMID 38216376）｜period: 2024 刊出｜geo: universal｜span: 「Direct analysis of success rates (2 studies, 123 teeth) showed a significant increase in success when a uniform circumferential ferrule was present (RR=1.28, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.54, P<.05).」「However, indirect analysis of survival and success rates (8 studies, 407 teeth) indicated no significant differences in outcomes between the ferrule and no ferrule groups (P>.05).」｜caveat: 直接比較僅 2 篇、123 顆牙；作者明言需更多高品質研究。與 KM-DENTAL-03 同錨。
• F10｜confidence: medium｜basis: peer_reviewed（clinical literature review，PMID 33128279）｜period: 檢索至 2020-07，2021 刊出｜geo: universal｜span: 「Whilst there is established consensus on the importance of the ferrule effect on the predictable restoration of root filled teeth, other factors, such as residual tooth volume, tooth location, number of proximal contacts, timing of the definitive restoration and the presence of cracks, have been reported to influence restoration and tooth survival.」｜caveat: 敘述性文獻回顧，非統合分析。
• F11｜confidence: medium｜basis: clinical_guideline（學會立場聲明，PMID 34378217）｜period: 2021 刊出｜geo: universal｜span: 「This position statement on the restoration of root filled teeth represents the consensus of an expert committee, convened by the European Society of Endodontology (ESE).」「The scientific basis of the recommendations made in this paper can be found in a recently published review article」｜caveat: 全文未能取回（付費牆），本卡僅依摘要陳述該聲明之存在與定位，未引用其任何個別臨床建議；其科學基礎之回顧＝F10。
• F12｜confidence: medium｜basis: peer_reviewed（systematic review，未做統合分析，PMID 37549135）｜period: 檢索 1946 至 2022-04，2024 刊出｜geo: universal｜span: 「A total of eleven studies met all predetermined search criteria.」「Survival results for full veneer crowns were reported at 87.8% at over two years, 95.1% at three years, and 84% - 97.73% at five to ten years.」「The data suggest that the use of onlays instead of full veneer crowns in the restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth is favourable in the short to midterm.」｜caveat: 以區間表列不同研究結果、未做統合估計，各研究追蹤年限與判定標準不一；onlay 兩年、三年存活率之區間下緣（95%、90.7%）於正文引用，上緣為個別研究的全數存活，本卡不逐字重述。
• F13｜confidence: medium｜basis: peer_reviewed（systematic review・meta-analysis，PMID 35835608）｜period: 2022 刊出｜geo: universal｜span: 「The overall failure rate that emerges is 0.087 with a ratio of 121/1254, I2 80 % p-value< 0.001.」「Moreover, by meta-regression with covariates the follow-up period reports a coefficient of 0.013 with a P-value< 0.001.」「Besides the survival rates of indirect adhesive restorations on endodontically treated posterior teeth, it was highlighted that the majority of failures appeared restorable.」｜caveat: 異質性高（I² 80%）；統合加權估計（0.087）與原文並列的事件粗比例（121/1254）口徑不同，正文已分別標示；時間趨勢之依據為統合迴歸係數，非分層直接比較。
• F14｜confidence: high｜basis: peer_reviewed（systematic review・meta-analysis，PMID 41489982）｜period: 2026 刊出，檢索窗 2014–2024，五年存活率估計｜geo: universal｜span: 「Sixty-four studies met inclusion, reporting on 3,509 metal-ceramic and 8,051 all-ceramic SCs.」「Five-year survival rates were: 98.5% for monolithic lithium-disilicate reinforced glass-ceramic, 97.3% for veneered densely-sintered zirconia, 97.1% for metal-ceramic, 96.8% for monolithic densely-sintered zirconia, 95.7% for veneered leucite/lithium-disilicate reinforced glass-ceramic, 94.5% for densely-sintered alumina, 94.3% for glass-infiltrated alumina, 90.4% for feldspathic/silica-based ceramic.」「Monolithic lithium-disilicate and monolithic zirconia crowns showed significantly fewer ceramic fractures and chipping compared to veneered alternatives.」「Lithium-disilicate and zirconia-based all-ceramic SCs achieve five-year survival rates comparable to metal-ceramic crowns.」｜caveat: 族群層級估計、追蹤五年，不可外推為個人預後；與 KM-DENTAL-03 同錨。版本時效查核（2026-08-06）：以 single crowns＋survival＋SR/MA 檢索 2024–2026 刊期，未見更晚於本篇的牙支撐單冠材料比較統合分析。
• F15｜confidence: medium｜basis: peer_reviewed（overview of systematic reviews，PMID 40750081）｜period: 檢索更新至 2025-02，2025 刊出｜geo: universal｜span: 「Ultimately, 28 systematic reviews on approximately 35,000 crowns published between 2007 and 2024 were included in the qualitative analysis.」「However, substantial methodological heterogeneity, limited long-term data (>5 years), and a concentration of studies on a single product」「Nevertheless, careful interpretation is warranted due to methodological variability, material-specific differences, and insufficient long-term data for newer lithium (di)silicate systems.」「practitioners should communicate both the well-documented short- to medium-term benefits and the remaining uncertainties regarding long-term performance」｜caveat: 綜覽對象為系統性回顧而非原始研究；本卡僅用其方法學限制之結論，未引用其存活率數值。
• F16｜confidence: medium｜basis: peer_reviewed（systematic review・meta-analysis，觀察性研究，PMID 34516686）｜period: 檢索至 2021-01，2022 刊出｜geo: universal｜span: 「Electronic searches provided 10,075 records among which 20 studies were selected for systematic review and 7 studies were selected for meta-analysis.」「The meta-analysis revealed clinical and radiographic success rate ranging between 92% to 98% at different follow up periods ranging between 5 years and 20 years.」「Future high-quality randomized clinical controlled trials with a larger population are required to confirm the evidence as only observational studies were considered in this paper.」｜caveat: 僅納入觀察性研究、異質性高；成功率之定義為牙髓與根尖狀態，非牙冠本身存活。
• F17｜confidence: high｜basis: clinical_guideline（2017 World Workshop 委託之敘述性回顧，PMID 29926939）｜period: 2018 刊出｜geo: universal｜span: 「Placement of restoration margins within the junctional epithelium and supracrestal connective tissue attachment can be associated with gingival inflammation and, potentially, recession.」「Procedures adopted for the fabrication of dental restorations and fixed prostheses have the potential to cause traumatic loss of periodontal supporting tissues.」「Restoration margins located within the gingival sulcus do not cause gingivitis if patients are compliant with self-performed plaque control and periodic maintenance.」「Hypersensitivity reactions can occur to dental materials.」｜caveat: 敘述性回顧（narrative review），非統合分析；與 KM-DENTAL-03 同錨。
• F18｜confidence: high｜basis: law（S15）｜period: 現行條文（2026-08-06 實測）｜geo: TW｜醫療法第 21 條。逐字 span：「醫療機構收取醫療費用之標準，由直轄市、縣（市）主管機關核定之。」
• F19｜confidence: high｜basis: law（S16）｜period: 現行條文（2026-08-06 實測）｜geo: TW｜醫療法第 22 條。逐字 span：「醫療機構收取醫療費用，應開給載明收費項目及金額之收據。」「醫療機構不得違反收費標準，超額或擅立收費項目收費。」
• F20｜confidence: high｜basis: law（S17）｜period: 現行條文（2026-08-06 實測）｜geo: TW｜醫療法第 81 條。逐字 span：「醫療機構診治病人時，應向病人或其法定代理人、配偶、親屬或關係人告知其病情、治療方針、處置、用藥、預後情形及可能之不良反應。」
• F21｜confidence: high｜basis: law（S18）｜period: 現行條文（2026-08-06 實測）｜geo: TW｜全民健康保險法第 51 條第 11 款。逐字 span：「義齒、義眼、眼鏡、助聽器、輪椅、拐杖及其他非具積極治療性之裝具。」
• F22｜confidence: high｜basis: official_statement（S20・S21）｜period: 1090117 核定；頁面 2026-08-06 以 ego-browser 實測可達｜geo: TW｜縣市衛生主管機關公告牙科收費標準之已驗例證。逐字 span（頁面標題）：「臺北市政府衛生局-收費標準-「臺北市醫療機構牙科收費標準表」(1090117核定)」；資料集標題「臺北市醫療收費標準 ｜ 政府資料開放平臺」，提供機關「臺北市政府衛生局」。caveat: 僅一縣市例證，其他縣市各自公告；本卡不引用其中任何金額。
• F23｜confidence: high｜basis: official_statement（S22，跨卡已驗事實，同錨）｜period: 2026-08-05 以 ego-browser 實測（OP 複驗）｜geo: TW｜健保署「醫材比價網」兩個查詢軌之品項分類皆不含牙科，頁面全文無「牙」字，以假牙、牙冠、植體、牙科、贋復查詢均為 0 筆。caveat: 本卡未重複實測，沿用 km-compliance/VERIFIED-FACTS.md 與 KM-DENTAL-03 卡 F17 之紀錄；官方資料庫可能更新，引用時請註明查證日期。
• F24｜confidence: high｜basis: law（S19）｜period: 現行條文（2026-08-06 實測）｜geo: TW｜醫療法第 87 條第 2 項。逐字 span：「醫學新知或研究報告之發表、病人衛生教育、學術性刊物，未涉及招徠醫療業務者，不視為醫療廣告。」本條為本卡合規註記之定位依據。

怎麼找到提供這項服務的院所

本站不列出任何院所名單，也不推薦、不評比、不比較任何醫療機構。

要找提供這項服務的診所，請用下列法定查詢管道自己查——它們的資料由主管機關維護，比任何名單都新：

>

- 衛生福利部「醫事機構查詢」：可依縣市、鄉鎮與科別（牙科）查出已完成開業登記的醫事機構，

結果會顯示機構名稱、地址與登記科別。這是確認「這家有沒有合法登記」的第一站。

- 中央健康保險署「特約醫事機構查詢」：可查該院所是不是健保特約。

關係到哪些項目走健保、哪些自費，直接影響你會拿到什麼樣的收費說明。

>

兩個系統都在各自主管機關的官方網站上，以「醫事機構查詢」「特約院所查詢」為關鍵字即可找到。

本站不轉貼網址，因為網址會變動，請以主管機關當下公告的入口為準。

>

急症不要花時間查名單：影響到呼吸、吞嚥、說話，或腫脹正在擴散時，直接就近掛急診。

合規註記

本文為衛生教育資訊（醫療法 87 條）[F24]，非醫療廣告，不推薦特定院所，且不提供任何金額或價格區間。單顆牙冠涉及不可逆的齒質修磨，具醫療風險與禁忌症，可能出現牙髓症狀、崩瓷、脫落、邊緣處牙齦發炎等情形；實際治療方式與效果因人而異，須由牙醫師評估。本卡整理的判斷因素供就醫溝通使用，不能取代臨床診斷。本文亦不提供保險理賠或契約條款之法律見解，相關問題依保單與契約條款而定。

來源清單

• S1 Pjetursson BE, Pitta J, Balet A, et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Evaluating the Survival, Failure, and Complication Rates of Metal-Ceramic, Veneered, and Monolithic All-Ceramic Tooth-Supported Single Crowns-Part 1. Int J Prosthodont. 2026;39(3):308-324. PMID 41489982. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41489982（取用 2026-08-06，efetch 摘要逐字對得上）
• S2 Laumbacher H, Scholz KJ, Knüttel H, Rosentritt M. Clinical outcomes and complications of tooth- and implant-supported lithium (di)silicate based single crowns: an overview of systematic reviews. J Dent. 2025;162:106004. PMID 40750081. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40750081（取用 2026-08-06，efetch 摘要逐字對得上）
• S3 Aquilino SA, Caplan DJ. Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(3):256-63. PMID 11941351. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11941351（取用 2026-08-06，efetch 摘要逐字對得上）
• S4 Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Carter B, et al. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(9):CD009109. PMID 26403154. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26403154（取用 2026-08-06，efetch 摘要逐字對得上；版本查核見 F5）
• S5 Patel SR, Jarad F, Moawad E, et al. The tooth survival of non-surgical root-filled posterior teeth and the associated prognostic tooth-related factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2024;57(10):1404-1421. PMID 38949036. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38949036（取用 2026-08-06，efetch 摘要逐字對得上）
• S6 AlSaleh E, Dutta A, Dummer PMH, et al. Influence of remaining axial walls on of root filled teeth restored with a single crown and adhesively bonded fibre post: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2021;114:103813. PMID 34530058. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34530058（取用 2026-08-06，efetch 摘要逐字對得上）
• S7 Al-Dabbagh RA, Sindi MA, Sanari MA, et al. Effect of a circumferential ferrule on the survival and success of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;132(6):1251-1259. PMID 38216376. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38216376（取用 2026-08-06，efetch 摘要逐字對得上）
• S8 Hajeer O, Hasan A, Kanout C, Morad ML. Ferrule dimensions and restoration outcomes in endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont. 2026;35(4):450-459. PMID 41601347. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41601347（取用 2026-08-06，efetch 摘要逐字對得上）
• S9 Bhuva B, Giovarruscio M, Rahim N, Bitter K, Mannocci F. The restoration of root filled teeth: a review of the clinical literature. Int Endod J. 2021;54(4):509-535. PMID 33128279. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33128279（取用 2026-08-06，efetch 摘要逐字對得上）
• S10 European Society of Endodontology; Mannocci F, Bhuva B, Roig M, Zarow M, Bitter K. European Society of Endodontology position statement: The restoration of root filled teeth. Int Endod J. 2021;54(11):1974-1981. PMID 34378217. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34378217（取用 2026-08-06，efetch 摘要逐字對得上；全文為付費牆，未取回，故未引用其個別建議）
• S11 Lane J, Sadeghzadeh-Araghi A, Jackson G, Bonsor S. Survival and Success Rates of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Full Veneer Crowns or Full Cuspal Coverage onlays: A Systematic Review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2024;32(1):45-55. PMID 37549135. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37549135（取用 2026-08-06，efetch 摘要逐字對得上）
• S12 Mario D, Mario A, Allegra C, et al. The influence of indirect bonded restorations on clinical prognosis of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2022;38(8):e203-e219. PMID 35835608. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35835608（取用 2026-08-06，efetch 摘要逐字對得上）
• S13 Kohli S, Bhatia S, Al-Haddad A, Pulikkotil SJ, Jamayet NB. Pulpal and Periapical Status of the Vital Teeth Used as Abutment for Fixed Prosthesis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Prosthodont. 2022;31(2):102-114. PMID 34516686. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34516686（取用 2026-08-06，efetch 摘要逐字對得上）
• S14 Ercoli C, Caton JG. Dental prostheses and tooth-related factors. J Periodontol. 2018;89 Suppl 1:S223-S236. PMID 29926939. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29926939（取用 2026-08-06，efetch 摘要逐字對得上）
• S15 醫療法 第 21 條（全國法規資料庫）。law.moj.gov.tw pcode=L0020021 flno=21（取用 2026-08-06，HTTP 200，條文逐字對得上）
• S16 醫療法 第 22 條（全國法規資料庫）。law.moj.gov.tw pcode=L0020021 flno=22（取用 2026-08-06，HTTP 200，兩項條文逐字對得上）
• S17 醫療法 第 81 條（全國法規資料庫）。law.moj.gov.tw pcode=L0020021 flno=81（取用 2026-08-06，HTTP 200，條文逐字對得上）
• S18 全民健康保險法 第 51 條（全國法規資料庫）。law.moj.gov.tw pcode=L0060001 flno=51（取用 2026-08-06，HTTP 200，第 11 款逐字對得上）
• S19 醫療法 第 87 條（全國法規資料庫）。law.moj.gov.tw pcode=L0020021 flno=87（取用 2026-08-06，HTTP 200，第 2 項逐字對得上）
• S20 臺北市政府衛生局－收費標準：「臺北市醫療機構牙科收費標準表」(1090117核定)。health.gov.taipei 收費標準頁（取用 2026-08-06，ego-browser 實測可達，頁面標題逐字對得上）
• S21 政府資料開放平臺 資料集 121913「臺北市醫療收費標準」。data.gov.tw/dataset/121913（取用 2026-08-06，ego-browser 實測可達，標題與提供機關逐字對得上）
• S22 衛生福利部中央健康保險署「醫材比價網」兩查詢軌之品項分類（跨卡已驗事實，同錨）。info.nhi.gov.tw INAE2000/INAE2010S01（2026-08-05 由 KM-DENTAL-03 卡以 ego-browser 實測並經 OP 複驗，紀錄見 km-compliance/VERIFIED-FACTS.md；本卡未重複實測）
• S23 內部資料：`analysis/reports/km-dental-backlog.md` 第 11 題附錄（14 診所站 GSC 全量，資料窗 2025-03～2026-08），14 詞項跨 4 站，逐筆可對帳。非醫學事實 basis，僅為選題依據，發布時不進可見層。
• S24 編輯框架（無外部來源）：本卡的六塊拆項結構、與固定假牙費用卡的分工邊界，見 F2、F3。

內部引用鏈

• 同族分流卡（必讀）：做一顆固定假牙要多少錢？先分清楚你要做的是牙冠還是牙橋（KM-DENTAL-03，草稿）。兩卡的 canonical 邊界：歸該卡的是——固定假牙三分流框架、牙橋（含懸臂式與黏著式）的存活率與併發症、植體支撐假牙的入口、臨時假牙脫落的臨床試驗；歸本卡的是——單顆牙冠的適應判斷（根管後與大範圍缺損）、環箍與剩餘齒質條件、部分覆蓋的替代方案、單冠各材質五年存活率與併發症的完整數據、單顆牙冠的報價拆項。本卡在重疊處只留一句摘述並指向該卡，不重複鋪陳；兩卡共用同一組台灣制度錨（醫療法第 21、22、81 條、健保法第 51 條）與 F9、F14、F17 三條文獻錨，法條與英文 span 依引用級要求逐字一致。
• 同族決策卡：蛀牙了一定要補嗎？補牙怎麼補？（KM-DENTAL-12，草稿）。若你的情境是「蛀牙還沒大到要做冠」，修復層級的選擇與判準在該卡；本卡承接的是齒質已大量缺損、被建議做冠之後的那一段。
• 前置處置卡：牙冠增長術是什麼？費用、保險、會不會痛（KM-DENTAL-17，草稿）。本卡第 2 塊費用組成提到的「環箍做不出來怎麼辦」，其中一條路就是該卡談的處置，適應症與費用組成請看那裡。
• 詞義分流卡：「牙套」要多少錢？矯正牙套與假牙牙套是兩回事（KM-DENTAL-08，草稿）。搜尋「牙套價格」而其實想問矯正器的讀者，應該從該卡開始。