km.idaeo.ai · IDAEO 知識庫

🏛 Part of the "reports" topic shelf

Considering orthodontic treatment in Banqiao: what can you check yourself, and what should you ask?|證據鏈

本頁是〈Considering orthodontic treatment in Banqiao: what can you check yourself, and what should you ask?〉的事實單元帳:每一條主張對應的來源、證據等級、地域與期間、原文引句與限制,逐條攤開。

Considering orthodontic treatment in Banqiao: what can you check yourself, and what should you ask?|證據鏈

F-Units (fact-unit ledger)

Each entry identifies source, confidence, basis, period, geo, and caveat. Basis hierarchy: law > official_statement > clinical_guideline > peer_reviewed > textbook.

  • F1|confidence: verified|basis: internal_dataset (S31; not a medical claim)|period: GSC retention window (from 2025-03-22)|geo: TW|Topic-selection basis: reconciled full search data from 14 clinic sites, query 「板橋牙齒矯正」 one site, record by record; the mounted list follows this topic’s row in the 「三、診所補題」 table of km-production-queue.html and must not be added to or deleted|caveat: impressions are asset-level figures, not deduplicated traffic; internal data; omit this whole entry when converting for publication.
  • F2 [structural organization]|confidence: n/a|basis: editorial (S30; not a factual claim; not to be labeled pending)|geo: universal|The long-course question framework; the distinction between what can and cannot be checked for specialty credentials; official-route testing; records and charts; division of scope from the choosing-dentist and clear-aligner-cost cards; and the policy of no provider list, ranking, clinical-skill assessment, pricing, or appliance recommendation are this site’s editorial structure, not an authority’s classification or recommendation|caveat: not a diagnostic tool, clinical guideline, or facility accreditation; does not replace dentist assessment.
  • F3 [evidence-gap statement]|confidence: n/a|basis: editorial (not pending verification)|geo: TW|This search did not obtain citable evidence for: ① any provider list, ranking, review, or recommendation; ② any amount, range, or market price; ③ an official public online system to verify an individual dentist’s specialist certificate; ④ a Taiwan-official rule or procedure specifically for transferring midway through orthodontic treatment; ⑤ item-by-item verification of dental self-pay fee schedules outside New Taipei City; ⑥ live testing of public disciplinary-information pages of local health departments (see F31); ⑦ scope and procedure for complaints to the New Taipei City Department of Health (only its home page was loaded; see F22); or ⑧ whether any dental specialty society is entrusted with preliminary examination review and whether its passing list is public (see F15)|caveat: search limited to English PubMed literature, Taiwan’s Laws & Regulations Database, the Ministry of Health and Welfare Medical Affairs Search System, the National Health Insurance contracted-provider search, New Taipei City Government notices, and the New Taipei City Department of Health home page; not obtained does not mean disproved.
  • F4|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser; page title “Medical Care Act §21—Laws & Regulations Database”; text matched verbatim)|basis: law (S12)|period: current provision|geo: TW|Article 21: standards for medical fees collected by medical institutions are approved by the municipality or county/city competent authority|caveat: statutory quotation, not legal advice; the same anchor is used in KM-DENTAL-49/03/11/26/48. [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「醫療法§21-全國法規資料庫」]
  • F5|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser; page title “Medical Care Act §22—Laws & Regulations Database”; both statements matched verbatim)|basis: law (S13)|period: current provision|geo: TW|Article 22 requires a receipt stating charged items and amounts, and prohibits charges above the standard or unauthorized charge items|caveat: statutory quotation, not legal advice. [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「醫療法§22-全國法規資料庫」]
  • F6|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser; page title “Medical Care Act §71—Laws & Regulations Database”; text matched verbatim)|basis: law (S14)|period: current provision|geo: TW|Article 71 requires a medical institution, at the request of a patient it has treated, to provide a medical-record copy and, where necessary, a Chinese medical-record summary; it may not delay or refuse without cause, and the necessary cost is borne by the patient|caveat: statutory quotation, not legal advice; this card makes no subsumption determination about whether a medical-record copy equals all orthodontic-treatment records and images. [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「醫療法§71-全國法規資料庫」]
  • F7|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser; page title “Medical Care Act §70—Laws & Regulations Database”; paragraphs 1 and 2 matched verbatim)|basis: law (S15)|period: current provision|geo: TW|Article 70 requires records to be stored by designated people in an appropriate place for at least seven years; records of minors for at least seven years after adulthood. If a facility cannot continue operating, records go to the successor; if there is no successor, the patient or representative may require delivery; remaining records must continue to be kept for at least six months before destruction|caveat: statutory quotation, not legal advice; paragraph 1 also has human-subject-research retention provisions and paragraphs 3–4 have competent-authority retention/destruction provisions, which this card does not cite. [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「醫療法§70-全國法規資料庫」]
  • F8|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser; page title “Medical Care Act §81—Laws & Regulations Database”; text matched verbatim)|basis: law (S16)|period: current provision|geo: TW|Article 81 requires a medical institution treating a patient to explain the condition, treatment policy, procedure, medication, prognosis, and possible adverse reactions to the patient or relevant representative|caveat: statutory quotation, not legal advice. [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「醫療法§81-全國法規資料庫」]
  • F9|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser; page title “Medical Care Act §85—Laws & Regulations Database”; all six subparagraphs of paragraph 1 matched verbatim)|basis: law (S17)|period: current provision|geo: TW|Article 85 paragraph 1 subparagraph 2 lists a physician’s name, sex, education, experience, and physician/specialist-certificate number as permitted medical-advertising content|caveat: statutory quotation, not legal advice; it defines the permitted scope of medical-advertising content. This card cites it only for the fact that a certificate number is permitted to be stated, not as a reverse inference that a facility must proactively produce it; case-specific violations are determined by the health authority, and this card makes no case-specific judgment. [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「醫療法§85-全國法規資料庫」]
  • F10|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser; page title “Medical Care Act §87—Laws & Regulations Database”; both statements matched verbatim)|basis: law (S18)|period: current provision|geo: TW|Article 87 treats content implying or referring to medical business as medical advertising, while publication of medical knowledge or research reports, patient health education, and academic journals not involving solicitation are not medical advertising|caveat: the basis for this card’s compliance note; the same anchor is used by multiple cards in this track. [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「醫療法§87-全國法規資料庫」]
  • F11|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser; page title “Physicians Act §7-1—Laws & Regulations Database”; all three paragraphs matched verbatim)|basis: law (S19)|period: current provision|geo: TW|Article 7-1 permits a physician completing specialist training and passing the central authority’s examination to apply for a specialist certificate; permits preliminary review to be entrusted to relevant specialty societies; and requires specialist classification and examination regulations to be set by the central authority|caveat: statutory quotation, not legal advice; this is the authorizing basis for the Regulations (Article 1 states they are made under Article 7-1 paragraph 3). [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「醫師法§7-1-全國法規資料庫」]
  • F12|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, full text live-loaded with ego-browser; page title “Regulations Governing Dental Specialist Classification and Examination—Laws & Regulations Database”; Articles 1 and 6 matched verbatim)|basis: law (S20)|period: current Regulations amended 2023-05-02|geo: TW|Article 6 lists dental specialties: oral and maxillofacial surgery; oral pathology; dento-maxillary orthodontics; periodontics; pediatric dentistry; endodontics; prosthodontics; operative dentistry; family dentistry; oral medicine for persons with special needs; implant dentistry; and other dental specialties recognized by the central competent authority|caveat: statutory quotation, not legal advice; classification is the statutory division for training and examination, not a ranking of ability or quality. This card does not cite Article 7’s recognition criteria or Article 3’s training-prerequisite exception details. [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「牙醫專科醫師分科及甄審辦法-全國法規資料庫」]
  • F13|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser; Articles 11 and 12 matched verbatim)|basis: law (S20)|period: current Regulations amended 2023-05-02|geo: TW|Article 11 paragraph 2 requires each specialty examination at least once per year, subject to central-authority adjustment for dental-specialist workforce supply and demand; Article 12 paragraph 1 provides for written and oral examinations and may include practical/on-site examination|caveat: statutory quotation, not legal advice; this card states only the regulatory frequency and has not verified actual sessions or years for any specialty; do not read it as the factual claim that Dento-maxillary Orthodontics is held every year. The foreign-certificate exception in Article 12 is not cited.
  • F14|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser; Articles 13, 17, and 18 matched verbatim)|basis: law (S20)|period: current Regulations amended 2023-05-02|geo: TW|Article 13 paragraph 2 sets certificate validity and each extension at a minimum of three years and a maximum of six years; Article 17 paragraph 2 requires issue/reissue/replacement to state the dental specialty and validity period; Article 18 paragraph 1 permits renewal application with required evidence within six months before expiry|caveat: statutory quotation, not legal advice; the special-reason delayed-renewal proviso in Article 18 and academic-activity criteria for extension in Article 14 are not itemized here.
  • F15|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser; Article 15 matched verbatim)|basis: law (S20)|period: current Regulations amended 2023-05-02|geo: TW|The first part of Article 15 permits the central competent authority, under Article 7-1 paragraph 2 of the Physicians Act, to entrust qualified dental specialty societies with preliminary review of dental-specialist examinations|caveat: statutory quotation, not legal advice; this card has not verified whether any dental specialty society is actually entrusted, nor any society roster or list, and therefore does not list a society roster as a verification route.
  • F16|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser; page title and site-map items read one by one)|basis: official_statement (S21)|period: live-loaded 2026-08-06|geo: TW|The title is “Ministry of Health and Welfare–Medical Affairs Search System–Site Map.” Its site-map lists healthcare-professional search, medical-institution search, aesthetic-medicine area, healthcare-professional gender-incident information area, and healthcare-professional disciplinary-decision search area: five items, with no specialist search|caveat: this supports only “the site-map page for this system does not list a specialist-search function”; it is insufficient to support “there is no official specialist-search route nationwide.” Other authorities or societies were not live-tested (see F3). [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「衛生福利部-醫事查詢系統-網站導覽」]
  • F17|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser; page title, explanatory text, and four drop-down menus read one by one)|basis: official_statement (S22)|period: live-loaded 2026-08-06|geo: TW|Title: “Ministry of Health and Welfare–Medical Affairs Search System–Medical Institution Search.” It states it lets the public search institutions currently open for practice and directs doubts to the local health authority. Conditions are institution name, institution category, location (county/city plus township/district), clinical department, and CAPTCHA. Institution-category menu: 19 options including medical institution, dental laboratory, and dental technology laboratory; county/city includes New Taipei City; township/district has 369 options including Banqiao District; clinical-department menu has 31 options, with only general dentistry containing the tooth character|caveat: we read only interface and explanatory text and submitted no actual query because the page requires CAPTCHA; no provider list was obtained. This is an administrative lawful-registration lookup, not a quality rating. We did not test linked filtering between the county/city and township/district menus, so the claim is only that Banqiao District appears in the township/district option list. [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「衛生福利部-醫事查詢系統-醫事機構查詢」]
  • F18|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser; page title, explanatory text, two drop-down menus, and all input fields read one by one; program comparison found no occurrence of “specialist” in full page text)|basis: official_statement (S23)|period: live-loaded 2026-08-06|geo: TW|Title: “Ministry of Health and Welfare–Medical Affairs Search System–Healthcare Professional Search.” It states it lets the public determine whether a provider is lawfully practicing and directs identity concerns to the local health authority. Conditions are name (at least two characters), personnel type (29 options, including dentist), practice county/city (including New Taipei City), and CAPTCHA; the full page contains no “specialist”|caveat: no actual-name search was submitted. The page also states that victim information protected under Article 50-1 of the Domestic Violence Prevention Act and Article 10 of the Stalking and Harassment Prevention Act and other laws is not public, so no data need not mean no practice. [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「衛生福利部-醫事查詢系統-醫事人員查詢」]
  • F19|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser and two actual queries submitted; drop-down menus read one by one; results-page title and condition line compared verbatim)|basis: official_statement (S24)|period: live-tested 2026-08-06|geo: TW|Search-page title: “National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare–Contracted Medical Institution Search.” County/city includes New Taipei City; after selection, township/district shows New Taipei City Banqiao District. Advanced-search type options are Western medicine, Chinese medicine, and dentistry. The clinical-department menu has 44 options, including Dento-maxillary Orthodontics, and remained 44 before and after type was dentistry (not filtered by type). Test 1: New Taipei City / New Taipei City Banqiao District / dentistry returned a paginated contracted-provider list; the results title and condition line were “New Taipei City | New Taipei City Banqiao District | Dentistry | Service periods: all, morning, afternoon, evening.” Test 2: adding Dento-maxillary Orthodontics returned dialog text “No data found”|caveat: we neither record, republish, nor cite any provider name, contact information, or count in the list; “No data found” is only the system response for that condition set and must not be used to infer local supply, facility ability, or any fact. Contracting and department registration are administrative facts, not quality certification. A further variant, New Taipei City without a township/district plus dentistry plus Dento-maxillary Orthodontics, neither reached a result page nor showed a dialog; that test had no conclusion and is not cited. [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「衛生福利部中央健康保險署-健保特約醫事機構查詢」、「衛生福利部中央健康保險署-健保特約醫事機構查詢清單」]
  • F20|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser; page title, breadcrumb, publication/revision history, and orthodontics-section item names read one by one)|basis: official_statement (S25)|period: page live-loaded 2026-08-06; schedule issued 2011-04-13 by New Taipei City Government order No. 1000030166 and revised multiple times, most recently listed as notice No. 1110952309 dated 2022-06-01|geo: TW|Title: “New Taipei City Dental Self-pay Fee Schedule–New Taipei City Government.” The “III. Dento-maxillary Orthodontics” section includes, verbatim in the source, local appliances, single-jaw and two-jaw fixed appliances at three jaw-status levels, functional jaw appliances, removable/fixed retainers, adjustment fee per visit, consultation, examination/diagnosis/treatment plan including 3D imaging, lingual full-mouth appliances, removable appliances, removable/fixed palatal expanders, temporary anchorage screws, miniplates, bite planes, dislodged-appliance fixation, removal, digital impressions, digital tooth set-up, digital-model output, single-/two-jaw clear aligners at three levels, and follow-up/adjustment fees inside and outside the general treatment course|caveat: this card cites no amount for any item; this is New Taipei City’s approved schedule and corresponding notices elsewhere were not item-by-item verified. It regulates chargeable items and ceilings, and cannot establish how any clinic actually quotes, schedules treatment, or writes a plan. “Orthodontic consultation (records may be provided on request)” is an item name only; the card gives no further interpretation of its scope. [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「新北市牙醫診療自費收費標準表-新北市政府」、「首頁 主題服務 醫療 醫療院所 各項收費標準 新北市牙醫診療自費收費標準表」]
  • F21|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser; note section read sentence by sentence)|basis: official_statement (S25)|period: same as F20|geo: TW|The three quoted notes are: NHI-status care follows relevant NHI provisions and non-NHI-status care follows the schedule; appliance/equipment items include basic materials and procedure fees unless otherwise specified, with special-material fees only for individual need plus patient consent; and examination/testing, instruction, assessment, and treatment-plan formulation include the basic report (record) fee and may not be charged another record-copy fee. The final source sentence contains an anomalous original wording, retained there without correction|caveat: the body’s statement that listed amounts are charge ceilings is a paraphrase, not a quotation (the source says “highest ceiling” and includes currency wording); special-material calculation, deliberation, the fee-ceiling calculation rule for consultation fees, and the list of unauthorized names such as transfer-bed fee are in the note but not reproduced with amounts or calculations. The consultation-fee condition, including written consent, belongs only to that item and must not be extended to all self-pay items. The body’s correspondence between orthodontic examination/diagnosis/treatment plan and treatment-plan formulation is textual category correspondence, not an authority’s item-specific determination.
  • F22|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, live-loaded with ego-browser; page title compared verbatim)|basis: official_statement (S26)|period: live-loaded 2026-08-06|geo: TW|The New Taipei City Department of Health official site was reachable; title: “New Taipei City Department of Health”|caveat: only entry-page reachability was verified; whether it has a public search page for medical-institution disciplinary action was not verified (see F31). This supports only that Banqiao’s local health authority has an existing reachable official site, not any claim about search functions.
  • F23|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, abstract retrieved by efetch and compared verbatim)|basis: peer_reviewed (systematic review with meta-analysis, PMID 26926017)|period: published 2016-03; on 2026-08-06, a follow-up search using “duration of comprehensive orthodontic treatment fixed appliances systematic review,” limited to 2021–2026 publication dates, found recent systematic reviews of specific comparisons (clear versus fixed appliances, bracket-slot size, customized brackets, and others) but no newer systematic review replacing this paper’s absolute-duration estimate|geo: universal|span: 「Twenty-five studies were included after screening: 20 randomized controlled trials and 5 controlled clinical trials. Twenty-two studies were eligible for meta-analysis after quality assessment.」「The mean treatment duration derived from the 22 included studies involving 1089 participants was 19.9 months (95% confidence interval, 19.58, 20.22 months).」「The mean number of required visits derived from 5 studies was 17.81 (95% confidence interval, 15.47, 20.15 visits).」「Based on prospective studies carried out in university settings, comprehensive orthodontic treatment on average requires less than 2 years to complete.」|caveat: prospective university-setting studies provide a population average, not an individual expectation; visit count derives from only 5 studies and has a wider confidence interval; do not rewrite as “your treatment will be 19.9 months” or any individualized promise.
  • F24|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, efetch compared verbatim)|basis: peer_reviewed (systematic review with meta-analysis, PMID 33015719)|period: published 2020-10-05|geo: universal|span: 「A total of 11 unique studies (one prospective and 10 retrospective non-randomized) with 2969 adolescents and 1380 adult patients were finally included.」「Meta-analysis of 7 studies found no significant difference in the duration of comprehensive treatment with fixed appliances (MD = - 0.8 month; 95% CI = - 4.2 to 2.6 months; P = 0.65; I2 = 92%) between adults and adolescents.」「On the other hand, alignment of palatally displaced canines lasted considerably longer in adults compared to adolescents (1 study; MD = 3.8 months; 95% CI = 1.4 to 6.2 months; P = 0.002).」「The quality of evidence for the meta-analysis was low due to the inclusion of non-randomized studies with considerable risk of bias.」|caveat: 10 of the 11 studies were retrospective non-randomized studies, so evidence quality is low; the main confidence interval crosses 0 and must be written as “does not exclude no difference,” not “adults and adolescents are equally fast”; heterogeneity I² = 92% is extreme; the palatally displaced-canine finding comes from only 1 study.
  • F25|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, efetch compared verbatim)|basis: peer_reviewed (systematic review, PMID 38607436)|period: published 2024-04-12|geo: universal|span: 「Out of the 3537 articles initially identified, ten eligible studies were included in this systematic review; six were RCTs.」「Only one study offered extraction-based treatment, while the other nine adopted non-extraction treatments.」「According to the GRADE, there is low evidence that treatment duration in mild to moderate crowding cases with clear aligners is similar to that in fixed orthodontic appliances.」「Meta-analysis was not administered due to high inconsistency.」「While the type of appliance used is a critical determinant of treatment duration, orthodontists should be aware of other factors that can significantly impact treatment time, such as patient and treatment-related factors.」|caveat: applicable only to mild-to-moderate crowding (9 of 10 studies were non-extraction); do not extrapolate to severe or extraction cases; GRADE evidence is low and there was no meta-analysis. The article’s CLINICAL RELEVANCE says appliance type is important while its result says the two are similar with low evidence; this card presents both and treats neither as the site’s comparative conclusion.
  • F26|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, efetch compared verbatim; PubMed pubtype Systematic Review/Journal Article, no retraction marker; a search for CD002283 confirmed 2023 pub5 as current version and 2016 pub4 as its prior version)|basis: peer_reviewed (Cochrane systematic review, PMID 37219527, CD002283.pub5)|period: published 2023-05-22; searched to 2022-04-27|geo: universal|span: 「Without a phase of retention after successful orthodontic treatment, teeth tend to 'relapse', that is, to return to their initial position.」「We excluded studies with aligners.」「We included 47 studies, with 4377 participants.」「AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence is low to very low certainty, so we cannot draw firm conclusions about any one approach to retention over another.」|caveat: the background’s “tend to relapse” is the review’s problem statement, not a newly measured incidence, and this card cites no relapse proportion; certainty is low to very low and the authors explicitly cannot conclude for any retention approach, so this card recommends no retainer type, material, or wear time; studies using clear aligners were excluded, so the conclusion does not cover that setting.
  • F27|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, efetch compared verbatim)|basis: peer_reviewed (overview of systematic reviews, PMID 33215186)|period: published 2021-08-03; literature searched to 2020-05-24|geo: universal|span: 「After excluding the non-relevant studies, 28 systematic reviews were included. Of which, 20 systematic reviews (71.5%) were of moderate and high-quality level of evidence.」「The incidence and severity of OIIRR increase with the fixed appliance, especially with heavy force, intrusion, torqueing movements, increased treatment duration, and treatment with extractions or with long apical displacement (particularly for maxillary incisors).」「There was insufficient evidence regarding most other treatment- and patient-related factors on OIIRR.」「the cause and effect relationship between OIIRR and orthodontic biomechanics has not been confirmed.」|caveat: this overview gives no pooled incidence estimate, so this card gives no ratio; the authors also record limited high-quality research and unconfirmed causation. Do not rewrite it as “orthodontics certainly causes root resorption” or “one approach is safer.”
  • F28|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, efetch compared verbatim)|basis: peer_reviewed (systematic review and meta-analysis, PMID 39717964)|period: published 2025-04 (online 2024-12-24)|geo: universal|span: 「Fifty-seven studies involving 9101 patients (mean age of 16.4 years, 33.5% male) were included.」「Among orthodontic patients, the pooled prevalence of WSLs was 55.06% (95% CI: 47.7%, 63.6%: 42 studies), incidence was 34.2% (95% CI: 27.6%, 40.6%: 44 studies) and surface prevalence was 26.9% (6 studies; 95% CI: 13.8%, 39.8%).」「Among non-treated patients, the pooled prevalence of WSLs was 29.1% (95% CI: 17.2%, 41.1%; 21 studies).」「Prevalence of WSLs increased with longer treatment duration (p < 0.001)」「Since one-third of untreated cases already have WSLs, proper documentation at treatment start is essential.」|caveat: pooled prevalence is a population average, not personal risk; differing detection methods were an important heterogeneity source; this card does not cite odds ratios—the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval for conventional fixed versus other appliances was 1 with p = 0.05, a boundary result unsuitable for health education. “One-third untreated” is cited in its original role supporting baseline documentation.
  • F29|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, efetch compared verbatim)|basis: peer_reviewed (scoping review, PMID 40008729)|period: published 2025-02-21|geo: universal|span: 「Qualitative assessments of the role of patient-centered pretreatment factors in orthodontic treatment success (adherence, satisfaction, and discontinuation rates) were evaluated and synthesized.」「A total of sixteen studies were included.」「Three main domains related to the patient emerged as positive predictors of orthodontic treatment success: previous patterns of social behavior, attitudes of parents/caregivers, and reasonable motivation.」「The evidence did not support the notion that the impact of malocclusion on aesthetic self-perception could serve as an indicator of cooperation, satisfaction, or discontinuation rates related to orthodontic treatment.」|caveat: a scoping review qualitatively synthesizing 16 studies; no meta-analysis or effect size. “Treatment success” means adherence, satisfaction, and discontinuation, not occlusal outcome or efficacy. Do not rewrite as a list for screening or judging patients.
  • F30|confidence: verified (2026-08-06, efetch compared verbatim; original paper French, PubMed supplies an English abstract)|basis: peer_reviewed (case-control study, PMID 30565556)|period: published 2018-12|geo: universal|span: 「Discontinuation of orthodontic treatment has iatrogenic, psychological, ergonomic and financial consequences.」|caveat: this sentence is in the study INTRODUCTION, an author problem statement rather than a measured result, as stated in the body. The single-institution case-control study had 55 discontinuers and 100 completers; its described discontinuation-risk characteristics are clinical-side analysis and are deliberately not reproduced, to avoid reader self-labeling.
  • F31 [pending verification]|confidence: low|basis: to be supplemented (not live-tested in this round)|geo: TW|Whether the New Taipei City Department of Health, and other county/city health departments, have public search pages for medical-institution disciplinary action and what their scope and update frequency are was not live-tested, so this card does not list them as verification routes|caveat: this site live-loaded only the department home page (F22) and did not verify further; not live-tested does not mean nonexistent. Only after an accessible entry and actual dental-institution data in the source are both verified may it be added under the three-part true-source rule. A pending item with the same anchor appears as F33 of KM-DENTAL-49.

How to find a clinic that provides this service

This site lists no clinics and does not recommend, rate or compare any medical institution.
To find a clinic that provides this service, use the following official lookup channels yourself —
they are maintained by the competent authorities and are more current than any list:

>

- The Ministry of Health and Welfare's medical-institution lookup: search by city or county,
township and specialty (dentistry) for institutions that have completed practice registration.
The results show the institution's name, address and registered specialty. This is the first place
to confirm whether a clinic is lawfully registered.
- The National Health Insurance Administration's contracted-institution lookup: check whether a
clinic is under contract with National Health Insurance. This determines which items are covered
and which are self-paid, and therefore what kind of fee explanation you will be given.

>

Both systems are on the respective authorities' official websites; searching for the
medical-institution lookup or the contracted-institution lookup will find them. This site does not
reproduce the URLs, because they change; use whichever entry point the authority currently publishes.

>

In an emergency, do not spend time looking up lists. If your breathing, swallowing or speech is
affected, or swelling is spreading, go to the nearest emergency department.

Chinese labels to look for on the official pages

These official systems, datasets and files are published in Chinese only. The English names above are this site's renderings; on the page itself you will see the following strings, so search for these:

>

- 「衛福部醫事查詢系統五項功能中沒有專科查詢」
- 「特約院所查詢」

Compliance note

This article is patient health education under Article 87 of Taiwan’s Medical Care Act [F10], not medical advertising. It recommends no specific facility, assesses no facility’s or dentist’s clinical skill, provides no list or ranking, and gives no amount or price range. Dento-maxillary orthodontic treatment has risks and contraindications, potentially including root resorption, white-spot (decalcification) lesions, tooth relapse after treatment, and other indication limits and discomfort. Actual treatment method and outcome vary by person and require dental assessment. The official search systems cited here provide administrative-registration facts, not medical-quality certification; a search result, including “No data found,” must not be used to judge clinical quality or service supply. The health authority determines whether any facility’s advertising violates rules; this card makes no case-specific judgment. This article also provides no legal or insurance-claim opinion; related questions depend on applicable laws and contract terms.

Sources

  • S1 Tsichlaki A, Chin SY, Pandis N, Fleming PS. How long does treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances last? A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Mar;149(3):308-18. PMID 26926017. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26926017 (accessed 2026-08-06; efetch abstract matched verbatim)
  • S2 Abbing A, Koretsi V, Eliades T, Papageorgiou SN. Duration of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances in adolescents and adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Prog Orthod. 2020 Oct 5;21(1):37. PMID 33015719. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33015719 (accessed 2026-08-06)
  • S3 Alhamwi AM, Burhan AS, Idris MI, Nawaya FR. Duration of orthodontic treatment with clear aligners versus fixed appliances in crowding cases: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Apr 12;28(5):249. PMID 38607436. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38607436 (accessed 2026-08-06)
  • S4 Martin C, Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn D, Worthington HV, Limones A. Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 22;5(5):CD002283. PMID 37219527. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37219527 (accessed 2026-08-06; confirmed current CD002283 version; no retraction marker)
  • S5 Yassir YA, McIntyre GT, Bearn DR. Orthodontic treatment and root resorption: an overview of systematic reviews. Eur J Orthod. 2021 Aug 3;43(4):442-456. PMID 33215186. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33215186 (accessed 2026-08-06)
  • S6 Hussain U, Wahab A, Kamran MA, et al. Prevalence, Incidence and Risk Factors of White Spot Lesions Associated With Orthodontic Treatment - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2025 Apr;28(2):379-399. PMID 39717964. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39717964 (accessed 2026-08-06)
  • S7 Santana LG, Gatti-Reis L, Paiva SM, Ramos-Jorge ML, Marques LS. Patient-centered factors associated with orthodontic treatment success: a scoping review. Braz Oral Res. 2025 Feb 21;39:e020. PMID 40008729. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40008729 (accessed 2026-08-06)
  • S8 Martin C, Gebeile-Chauty S. Discontinuation of Orthodontic Treatment: what are the early predictive factors? Orthod Fr. 2018 Dec;89(4):371-386. PMID 30565556. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30565556 (accessed 2026-08-06; original French; cited sentence is from PubMed’s English abstract)
  • S9 Unused (number reserved).
  • S10 Unused (number reserved).
  • S11 Unused (number reserved).
  • S12 Taiwan Medical Care Act, Article 21. Official English translation (live-loaded with ego-browser 2026-08-06; text matched verbatim) [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「醫療法§21-全國法規資料庫」]
  • S13 Taiwan Medical Care Act, Article 22. Official English translation (live-loaded with ego-browser 2026-08-06; both statements matched verbatim)
  • S14 Taiwan Medical Care Act, Article 71. Official English translation (live-loaded with ego-browser 2026-08-06; text matched verbatim)
  • S15 Taiwan Medical Care Act, Article 70. Official English translation (live-loaded with ego-browser 2026-08-06; paragraphs 1 and 2 matched verbatim)
  • S16 Taiwan Medical Care Act, Article 81. Official English translation (live-loaded with ego-browser 2026-08-06; text matched verbatim)
  • S17 Taiwan Medical Care Act, Article 85. Official English translation (live-loaded with ego-browser 2026-08-06; six subparagraphs of paragraph 1 matched verbatim)
  • S18 Taiwan Medical Care Act, Article 87. Official English translation (live-loaded with ego-browser 2026-08-06; both statements matched verbatim)
  • S19 Physicians Act, Article 7-1. law.moj.gov.tw pcode=L0020001 flno=7-1 (live-loaded with ego-browser 2026-08-06; three paragraphs matched verbatim) [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「醫師法§7-1-全國法規資料庫」]
  • S20 Regulations Governing Dental Specialist Classification and Examination (amended 2023-05-02). law.moj.gov.tw pcode=L0020200 (full text live-loaded with ego-browser 2026-08-06; Articles 1, 6, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, and 18 matched verbatim) [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「牙醫專科醫師分科及甄審辦法-全國法規資料庫」]
  • S21 Ministry of Health and Welfare Medical Affairs Search System—Site Map. ma.mohw.gov.tw Site Map (live-loaded with ego-browser 2026-08-06; five site-map functions read one by one) [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「衛生福利部-醫事查詢系統-網站導覽」]
  • S22 Ministry of Health and Welfare Medical Affairs Search System—Medical Institution Search. ma.mohw.gov.tw Medical Institution Search (live-loaded with ego-browser 2026-08-06; four drop-down menus read one by one; explanatory text matched; no actual query submitted)
  • S23 Ministry of Health and Welfare Medical Affairs Search System—Healthcare Professional Search. ma.mohw.gov.tw Healthcare Professional Search (live-loaded with ego-browser 2026-08-06; menus and inputs read one by one; full-page comparison found no “specialist”; no real-name query submitted)
  • S24 National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare—Contracted Medical Institution Search. info.nhi.gov.tw INAE1000S01 (live-loaded with ego-browser 2026-08-06; menus read one by one and two queries submitted: “New Taipei City / New Taipei City Banqiao District / dentistry” returned a list; adding “Dento-maxillary Orthodontics” gave “No data found”; this site records and republishes neither list contents nor count)
  • S25 New Taipei City Government, “New Taipei City Dental Self-pay Fee Schedule.” ntpc.gov.tw New Taipei City Dental Self-pay Fee Schedule (live-loaded with ego-browser 2026-08-06; page title, breadcrumb, publication/revision history, orthodontics-section item names, and note paragraphs read one by one; this card cites no amount) [On the official page the label appears in Chinese only: 「新北市牙醫診療自費收費標準表」]
  • S26 New Taipei City Department of Health official website. health.ntpc.gov.tw (live-loaded with ego-browser 2026-08-06; title “New Taipei City Department of Health”; entry only verified)
  • S30 Editorial framework (no external source): this card’s long-course question framework, checkable/non-checkable specialty distinction, official-route testing method, and boundaries of no list/ranking/clinical-skill evaluation/pricing/appliance recommendation; see F2 and F3.
  • S31 Internal data: this topic’s row in the “clinic follow-up topics” table of km-production-queue.html (full GSC reconciliation for 14 clinic assets, data window from 2025-03), one query and one site, record by record. Not a medical fact; topic-selection basis only; omitted from public visible content.

Internal citation chain

  • The canonical general guide is the choosing-dentist card: How do you choose a dentist in Shulin? Start with what official systems can verify, then see how the first visit is explained (KM-DENTAL-49, draft). Boundary: the full explanation of three official verification steps, what online reviews can and cannot tell you, Medical Care Act 85/86 advertising-compliance signals, and evidence about decision variation when two facilities explain differently are in that card. This card does not repeat them; it adds orthodontics-specific issues of long course, specialty classification, records, and retention. Both cards share the same Taiwan-system anchors: Medical Care Act 21/22/81/85/87, the Ministry of Health and Welfare Medical Affairs Search System, and the NHI contracted-provider search (this card’s F4/F5/F8/F9/F10/F17/F18/F19).
  • The canonical cost-item breakdown is in the cost cards: How much do clear aligners cost? How is that amount constructed? (KM-DENTAL-C03, draft) and How much do “braces” cost? (KM-DENTAL-08, draft). Boundary: cost composition, breakdown logic, and how to read difficulty grading are in those cards (C03 uses Taipei City’s approved schedule). This card uses only the New Taipei City schedule’s item structure to explain course stages and the difference between visits inside/outside the treatment course; the cards do not duplicate breakdowns, and the two cities’ approved documents are not interchangeable.
  • Oral hygiene and return-visit frequency: How often should you have dental scaling? How much does it cost? (KM-DENTAL-43, draft). General health education on white-spot risk and hygiene during orthodontics is already within that card’s scope. This card cites only population-level white-spot evidence in its risk section and does not repeat cleaning methods.
Publication-gate reminder: this card is a draft. It must not be marked published until F31 (public disciplinary-information pages of county/city health departments) is verified; it must not enter km_entries until the four languages (zh-Hans/en/ja) are produced. It contains no clinical red-flag criteria or symptom stratification and is an FAQ card; because it is local and dense with solicitation-compliance interpretation, OP should decide whether to add a cross-architecture compliance review.

FAQ

Can I trust a list that comes up when I search “Banqiao orthodontics”?
First distinguish what it is. Online lists may be advertising, rankings on review sites, or content-farm compilations. **This site comments on no list and provides no list** [F2]. A check you can do yourself works in the other direction: use the Ministry of Health and Welfare institution search to verify that a facility is a medical institution currently open for practice (the township/district menu includes Banqiao District) [F17]; use the healthcare-professional search to verify that the clinician is a lawfully practicing dentist [F18]; and use the National Health Insurance contracted-institution search to verify contracted status (our “New Taipei City / New Taipei City Banqiao District / dentistry” test returned a list) [F19]. The complete guide to reading online reviews and recognizing advertising signals is in the choosing-dentist card and is not repeated here [F2].
「板橋 歯列矯正」で出る一覧は信頼できますか?まず種類を分けてください。広告、評価サイトの順位、コンテンツファームのまとめなどがあり、**当サイトはどの一覧も論評せず、一覧も提供しません** [F2]。逆向きに、医事機構照会で現在開業中の医療機構か(郷鎮市区に板橋区あり)[F17]、医事人員照会で合法執業の歯科医師か [F18]、健保特約医事機構照会で特約状態か(新北市/新北市板橋区/牙医で一覧取得を実測)[F19] を確かめられます。オンライン評価・広告シグナルの全体は選び方カードにあります [F2]。
Can I trust a list that comes up when I search “Banqiao orthodontics”?First distinguish what it is. Online lists may be advertising, rankings on review sites, or content-farm compilations. **This site comments on no list and provides no list** [F2]. A check you can do yourself works in the other direction: use the Ministry of Health and Welfare institution search to verify that a facility is a medical institution currently open for practice (the township/district menu includes Banqiao District) [F17]; use the healthcare-professional search to verify that the clinician is a lawfully practicing dentist [F18]; and use the National Health Insurance contracted-institution search to verify contracted status (our “New Taipei City / New Taipei City Banqiao District / dentistry” test returned a list) [F19]. The complete guide to reading online reviews and recognizing advertising signals is in the choosing-dentist card and is not repeated here [F2].
Can I check online whether a particular dentist has a Dento-maxillary Orthodontics specialist certificate?
**This site did not find an official public online system for verifying an individual dentist’s specialist certificate** [F16][F3]. Our test found that the Ministry of Health and Welfare Medical Affairs Search System’s site map lists five functions and none is specialist search [F16]; its healthcare-professional search has only name, personnel type, practice county/city, and CAPTCHA, and its full page does not contain “specialist” [F18]. A practical alternative is to ask the institution to state the specialist-certificate number under Article 85 of Taiwan’s Medical Care Act (the provision lists a certificate number as permitted content) [F9]. If identity remains in doubt, follow that page’s instruction and report it to the health competent authority where the facility is located [F18]. **Not found does not mean nonexistent**; see the evidence-gap statement for this card’s search scope [F3].
特定の歯科医師が齒顎矯正科専門医証書を持つか、ネットで確認できますか?**一般の人が個別の専門医証書をオンライン照合できる公式システムは、当サイトでは見つけられませんでした** [F16][F3]。サイトマップの5機能に専門医照会はなく [F16]、医事人員照会も氏名・人員類別・執業県市・認証コードだけで、「專科」を含みません [F18]。代替として台湾医療法第 85 条の範囲で医院に証書番号の記載を求め、身元に疑義があれば所在地の衛生主管機関に連絡できます [F9][F18]。**見つからないことは、存在しないことを意味しません**。検索範囲は根拠欠落声明を見てください [F3]。
Can I check online whether a particular dentist has a Dento-maxillary Orthodontics specialist certificate?**This site did not find an official public online system for verifying an individual dentist’s specialist certificate** [F16][F3]. Our test found that the Ministry of Health and Welfare Medical Affairs Search System’s site map lists five functions and none is specialist search [F16]; its healthcare-professional search has only name, personnel type, practice county/city, and CAPTCHA, and its full page does not contain “specialist” [F18]. A practical alternative is to ask the institution to state the specialist-certificate number under Article 85 of Taiwan’s Medical Care Act (the provision lists a certificate number as permitted content) [F9]. If identity remains in doubt, follow that page’s instruction and report it to the health competent authority where the facility is located [F18]. **Not found does not mean nonexistent**; see the evidence-gap statement for this card’s search scope [F3].
How long does orthodontic treatment take?
Be clear first: these are **population averages, not your personal expected value**; a dentist must assess your duration from your actual circumstances [F23]. In the literature, mean fixed-appliance duration was 19.9 months (95% confidence interval 19.58 to 20.22 months; 22 studies, 1089 participants), and the mean required visits were 17.81 (5 studies); the included studies were prospective university-setting studies [F23]. A separate meta-analysis found no significant adult–adolescent difference in comprehensive-course duration (mean difference −0.8 month, confidence interval crossing 0), and low-certainty evidence found similar duration for clear and fixed appliances in mild-to-moderate crowding cases [F24][F25]. Thus, **ask how your plan is staged and how many visits it anticipates**. Current appliance-type evidence covers only mild-to-moderate crowding, and its authors also say patient- and treatment-related factors can significantly affect time [F25][F2].
矯正はどのくらいかかりますか?以下は**集団平均で、あなた個人の予測値ではありません**。期間は実際の状態を歯科医師が評価します [F23]。固定式装置の平均は 19.9 か月(95% 信頼区間 19.58〜20.22 か月、22 研究、1089 人)、必要通院回数の平均は 17.81 回(5 研究)で、大学医療機関の前向き研究です [F23]。成人・青少年の包括的治療期間に有意差なし(平均差 −0.8 か月、信頼区間は 0 をまたぐ)という統合結果と、軽度〜中等度叢生で透明・固定装置は近いとする低い確実性の根拠があります [F24][F25]。だから**自分の計画の段階と通院回数予定を聞く**べきです。装置と時間の根拠は軽度〜中等度に限られ、患者側・治療側因子も時間に影響します [F25][F2]。
How long does orthodontic treatment take?Be clear first: these are **population averages, not your personal expected value**; a dentist must assess your duration from your actual circumstances [F23]. In the literature, mean fixed-appliance duration was 19.9 months (95% confidence interval 19.58 to 20.22 months; 22 studies, 1089 participants), and the mean required visits were 17.81 (5 studies); the included studies were prospective university-setting studies [F23]. A separate meta-analysis found no significant adult–adolescent difference in comprehensive-course duration (mean difference −0.8 month, confidence interval crossing 0), and low-certainty evidence found similar duration for clear and fixed appliances in mild-to-moderate crowding cases [F24][F25]. Thus, **ask how your plan is staged and how many visits it anticipates**. Current appliance-type evidence covers only mild-to-moderate crowding, and its authors also say patient- and treatment-related factors can significantly affect time [F25][F2].

Source anchors

Cite this article

km 編輯部・《Considering orthodontic treatment in Banqiao: what can you check yourself, and what should you ask?|證據鏈》・IDAEO 知識庫・2026-08-13・https://km.idaeo.ai/post/reports/dental-orthodontics-banqiao-evidence

更新 2026-08-13T14:17:27.433Z · server-rendered · four-language · IDAEO 知識庫